Australia vs China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum

Australia
1.07 ratio
in 2022
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
0.946 ratio
in 2022
Australia rank
4th
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
1st

Adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum over time

  • Australia
  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
00.250.50.751200020112022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.07 ratio against 0.946 ratio in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 0.124 ratio.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 4th and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 1st of 51 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Difference Ahead
2000s 1 ratio 0.9799 ratio 0.0226 ratio Australia
2010s 1.03 ratio 0.9826 ratio 0.0499 ratio Australia
2020s 1.07 ratio 0.946 ratio 0.1212 ratio Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum, Australia or China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?
Australia, at 1.07 ratio against 0.946 ratio in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2022.
What is the difference in adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum between Australia and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?
0.124 ratio, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?
8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Australia and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank globally for adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum?
Australia ranks 4th and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 1st of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-immigration-status-parity-index-for-achieving-a-minimum-proficiency-level-in/australia/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-immigration-status-parity-index-for-achieving-a-minimum-proficiency-level-in/australia/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/">Australia vs China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted immigration status parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio)
Unit
ratio
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
53 places, 365 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed