Indonesia vs South Korea: Agricultural support estimate (% of GDP)
Agricultural support estimate (% of GDP) over time
- Indonesia
- South Korea
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 4.6% against 1.7% in South Korea, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 2.8 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Korea ahead.
Indonesia ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 4th of 22 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.1% | 4.7% | 6.7% | South Korea |
| 2000s | 1.5% | 2.8% | 1.3% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 1.8% | 1.7% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural support estimate, Indonesia or South Korea?
- Indonesia, at 4.6% against 1.7% in South Korea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in agricultural support estimate between Indonesia and South Korea?
- 2.9%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Korea?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
- How do Indonesia and South Korea rank globally for agricultural support estimate?
- Indonesia ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 4th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Producer and Consumer Support Estimates database. Available online at www.oecd.org/tad/support/psecse, published as Agricultural support estimate (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture support is the annual monetary value of all gross transfers from taxpayers and consumers, both domestic and foreign (in the form of subsidies arising from policy measures that support agriculture), net of the associated budgetary receipts, regardless of their objectives and impacts on farm production and income, or consumption of farm products.