Kazakhstan vs Switzerland: Agricultural support estimate
Agricultural support estimate over time
- Kazakhstan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 1.4% against 1.3% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Switzerland ranks 7th of 22 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.1% | 2.8% | 0.7% | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 1.7% | 0.5% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural support estimate, Kazakhstan or Switzerland?
- Kazakhstan, at 1.4% against 1.3% in Switzerland as of 2015.
- What is the difference in agricultural support estimate between Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and Switzerland rank globally for agricultural support estimate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Switzerland ranks 7th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Producer and Consumer Support Estimates database. Available online at www.oecd.org/tad/support/psecse, published as Agricultural support estimate (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture support is the annual monetary value of all gross transfers from taxpayers and consumers, both domestic and foreign (in the form of subsidies arising from policy measures that support agriculture), net of the associated budgetary receipts, regardless of their objectives and impacts on farm production and income, or consumption of farm products.