Aruba vs Zimbabwe: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)
Aruba
13.92 µg/m³
in 2023
Zimbabwe
13.49 µg/m³
in 2023
Aruba rank
124th
Zimbabwe rank
125th
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time
- Aruba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 13.92 µg/m³ against 13.49 µg/m³ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.43 µg/m³.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 256 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.4 µg/m³ | 12.77 µg/m³ | 4.63 µg/m³ | Aruba |
| 2020s | 14.56 µg/m³ | 12.84 µg/m³ | 1.72 µg/m³ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Aruba or Zimbabwe?
- Aruba, at 13.92 µg/m³ against 13.49 µg/m³ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Aruba and Zimbabwe?
- 0.43 µg/m³, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Zimbabwe rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
- Aruba ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.