Iceland vs Norfolk Island: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)
Iceland
5.64 µg/m³
in 2023
Norfolk Island
5.32 µg/m³
in 2023
Iceland rank
242nd
Norfolk Island rank
245th
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time
- Iceland
- Norfolk Island
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 5.64 µg/m³ against 5.32 µg/m³ in Norfolk Island, a difference of 0.32 µg/m³.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Norfolk Island's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 242nd and Norfolk Island ranks 245th of 256 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Norfolk Island | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.41 µg/m³ | 5.73 µg/m³ | 0.6758 µg/m³ | Iceland |
| 2020s | 5.96 µg/m³ | 5.86 µg/m³ | 0.1023 µg/m³ | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Iceland or Norfolk Island?
- Iceland, at 5.64 µg/m³ against 5.32 µg/m³ in Norfolk Island as of 2023.
- What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Iceland and Norfolk Island?
- 0.32 µg/m³, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norfolk Island?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Norfolk Island rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
- Iceland ranks 242nd and Norfolk Island ranks 245th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.