Kiribati vs New Caledonia: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)
Kiribati
5.75
in 2023
New Caledonia
5.81
in 2023
Kiribati rank
239th
New Caledonia rank
236th
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time
- Kiribati
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 5.81 against 5.75 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 239th and New Caledonia ranks 236th of 254 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.81 | 6.37 | 0.4334 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 6.69 | 6.34 | 0.3479 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Kiribati or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 5.81 against 5.75 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Kiribati and New Caledonia?
- 0.06, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Caledonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and New Caledonia rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
- Kiribati ranks 239th and New Caledonia ranks 236th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.