Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)
Kiribati
5.75 µg/m³
in 2023
Tuvalu
5.75 µg/m³
in 2023
Kiribati rank
239th
Tuvalu rank
240th
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time
- Kiribati
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 5.75 µg/m³ against 5.75 µg/m³ in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 µg/m³.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 239th and Tuvalu ranks 240th of 254 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.81 µg/m³ | 6.31 µg/m³ | 0.5024 µg/m³ | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 6.69 µg/m³ | 6.25 µg/m³ | 0.4454 µg/m³ | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Kiribati or Tuvalu?
- Kiribati, at 5.75 µg/m³ against 5.75 µg/m³ in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 0 µg/m³, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
- Kiribati ranks 239th and Tuvalu ranks 240th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.