Myanmar vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)

Myanmar
28.8
in 2023
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
6.18
in 2023
Myanmar rank
40th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
37th

Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time

  • Myanmar
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
102030201020162023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 28.8 against 6.18 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 22.62.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 4.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 40th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th of 254 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2010s 28.62 6.89 21.73 Myanmar
2020s 23.89 6.69 17.2 Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Myanmar or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Myanmar, at 28.8 against 6.18 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Myanmar and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
22.62, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
Myanmar ranks 40th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th of 254 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/annual-mean-levels-of-fine-particulate-matter-population-weighted-by-location-micrograms/myanmar/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/annual-mean-levels-of-fine-particulate-matter-population-weighted-by-location-micrograms/myanmar/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Myanmar vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
291 places, 4,074 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed