Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
6.18
in 2023
Uganda
29.55
in 2023
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
37th
Uganda rank
37th

Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Uganda
51015202530201020162023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 29.55 against 6.18 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 23.37.

That makes Uganda's figure about 4.8 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th and Uganda ranks 37th of 37 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Uganda Difference Ahead
2010s 6.89 29.53 22.64 Uganda
2020s 6.69 30.14 23.45 Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 29.55 against 6.18 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda?
23.37, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th and Uganda ranks 37th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/annual-mean-levels-of-fine-particulate-matter-population-weighted-by-location-micrograms/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/annual-mean-levels-of-fine-particulate-matter-population-weighted-by-location-micrograms/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uganda/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
291 places, 4,074 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed