Oceania vs Uganda: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)
Oceania
6.19 µg/m³
in 2023
Uganda
29.55 µg/m³
in 2023
Oceania rank
36th
Uganda rank
37th
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time
- Oceania
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 29.55 µg/m³ against 6.19 µg/m³ in Oceania, a difference of 23.36 µg/m³.
That makes Uganda's figure about 4.8 times Oceania's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 37th of 37 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.85 µg/m³ | 29.53 µg/m³ | 22.68 µg/m³ | Uganda |
| 2020s | 6.16 µg/m³ | 30.14 µg/m³ | 23.98 µg/m³ | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Oceania or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 29.55 µg/m³ against 6.19 µg/m³ in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Oceania and Uganda?
- 23.36 µg/m³, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Uganda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Uganda rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
- Oceania ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 37th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.