Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)

Turks and Caicos Islands
13.94
in 2023
Zimbabwe
13.49
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zimbabwe
05101520201020162023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 13.94 against 13.49 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.45.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 254 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 18.23 12.77 5.46 Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 15.72 12.84 2.87 Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 13.94 against 13.49 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted) between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
0.45, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 254 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/annual-mean-levels-of-fine-particulate-matter-population-weighted-by-location-micrograms/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/annual-mean-levels-of-fine-particulate-matter-population-weighted-by-location-micrograms/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
291 places, 4,074 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed