Aruba vs China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status

Aruba
18.2%
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
7.9%
in 2024
Aruba rank
5th
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
2nd

Average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status over time

  • Aruba
  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
51015202530200020122024

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 18.2% against 7.9% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 10.3%.

That makes Aruba's figure about 2.3 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 5th and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 2nd of 235 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Difference Ahead
2000s 20.7% 8.0% 12.7% Aruba
2010s 16.3% 7.8% 8.5% Aruba
2020s 19.7% 7.9% 11.7% Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status, Aruba or China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?
Aruba, at 18.2% against 7.9% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status between Aruba and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?
10.3%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?
17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Aruba and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank globally for average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status?
Aruba ranks 5th and China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 2nd of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status, by type of product (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/average-tariff-applied-by-developed-countries-preferential-status-by-type-of-product/aruba/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/average-tariff-applied-by-developed-countries-preferential-status-by-type-of-product/aruba/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/">Aruba vs China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average tariff applied by developed countries, preferential status, by type of product (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
242 places, 4,114 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed