Lithuania vs Slovenia: Average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural product
Average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural product over time
- Lithuania
- Slovenia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 9.9% against 9.9% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 3rd of 33 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.8% | 12.8% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 11.1% | 11.1% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 9.0% | 9.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural product, Lithuania or Slovenia?
- Lithuania, at 9.9% against 9.9% in Slovenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural product between Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2014.
- How do Lithuania and Slovenia rank globally for average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural product?
- Lithuania ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 3rd of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Trade Organization, and International Trade Center. Data are available online at: www.mdg-trade.org, published as Average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural products from developing countries (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It is the average tariffs imposed by developed countries on subsets of selected items (agricultural products, textile and clothing exports) that are deemed to be of interest to developing countries. For the purpose of calculating this indicator, Japan in Asia, Canada and the United States in North America, Australia and New Zealand in Oceania and Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the EU (25 countries included since 2004) in Europe are considered “developed” regions or areas, following the common accepted practice used for MDG indicators. Developing countries are those not listed as developed or transition countries. The list of least developed countries (LDCs) has been agreed by the General Assembly, on the recommendation of the Committee for Development Policy, Economic and Social Council. Agricultural, clothing and textile groups follow the definition in WTO agreements based on the Harmonized System 1992, transposed to current versions by WTO Secretariat. Agricultural products correspond to Harmonized System 1992, chapters 01 to 24 less fish and fish products (chap. 03); in addition to parts of chapters 29, 33, 35, 38, 41, 43, 50 to 53. Textile is mainly covered in chapters 50 to 60. The bulk of clothing products are found in chapters 61-63.