What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Australia and Belgium?

198.78 million current US$, with Belgium ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?

15 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.

Where does this data come from?

Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Belgium: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied

Australia

1.02 billion current US$

in 2009

Belgium

1.22 billion current US$

in 2010

Australia rank

14th

Belgium rank

11th

Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time

Australia
Belgium

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 1.22 billion current US$ against 1.02 billion current US$ in Australia, a difference of 198.78 million current US$.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 14th and Belgium ranks 11th of 22 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Belgium	Difference	Ahead
1990s	195.31 million current US$	135.59 million current US$	59.72 million current US$	Australia
2000s	749.59 million current US$	699.05 million current US$	50.53 million current US$	Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Australia or Belgium?: Belgium, at 1.22 billion current US$ against 1.02 billion current US$ in Australia as of 2010.
What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Australia and Belgium?: 198.78 million current US$, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?: 15 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?: Australia ranks 14th and Belgium ranks 11th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (current US$)
Unit: current US$
Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 22 places, 379 data points, 1990–2010
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries. OECD DAC.