Austria vs Italy: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time
- Austria
- Italy
How they compare
Austria currently reports 67.7% against 58.5% in Italy, a difference of 9.2%.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 19th and Italy ranks 21st of 22 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.8% | 35.8% | 13.0% | Austria |
| 2000s | 76.7% | 66.9% | 9.8% | Austria |
| 2010s | 67.7% | 58.5% | 9.2% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Austria or Italy?
- Austria, at 67.7% against 58.5% in Italy as of 2010.
- What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Austria and Italy?
- 9.2%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Italy?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Austria and Italy rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
- Austria ranks 19th and Italy ranks 21st of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.