Austria vs Switzerland: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time
- Austria
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 74.0% against 67.7% in Austria, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Switzerland ahead.
Austria ranks 19th and Switzerland ranks 17th of 22 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.4% | 82.0% | 32.6% | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 69.6% | 96.7% | 27.2% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 67.7% | 74.0% | 6.3% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Austria or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 74.0% against 67.7% in Austria as of 2010.
- What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Austria and Switzerland?
- 6.3%, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Switzerland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Austria and Switzerland rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
- Austria ranks 19th and Switzerland ranks 17th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.