Belgium vs Germany: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time
- Belgium
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 96.0% against 93.2% in Belgium, a difference of 2.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Germany ahead.
Belgium ranks 11th and Germany ranks 8th of 22 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.0% | 67.1% | 34.1% | Germany |
| 2000s | 92.6% | 92.6% | 0.0% | Germany |
| 2010s | 93.2% | 96.0% | 2.8% | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Belgium or Germany?
- Germany, at 96.0% against 93.2% in Belgium as of 2010.
- What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Belgium and Germany?
- 2.8%, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
- Belgium ranks 11th and Germany ranks 8th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.