Belgium vs New Zealand: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time
- Belgium
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 93.2% against 89.4% in New Zealand, a difference of 3.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.
Belgium ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 13th of 22 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.9% | 100.0% | 87.1% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 93.8% | 86.5% | 7.3% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 93.2% | 89.4% | 3.9% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Belgium or New Zealand?
- Belgium, at 93.2% against 89.4% in New Zealand as of 2010.
- What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Belgium and New Zealand?
- 3.8%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
- Belgium ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 13th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.