Italy vs United States of America: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied

Italy
58.5%
in 2010
United States of America
69.5%
in 2010
Italy rank
21st
United States of America rank
18th

Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time

  • Italy
  • United States of America
020406080100199020002010

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 69.5% against 58.5% in Italy, a difference of 11.0%.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United States of America ahead.

Italy ranks 21st and United States of America ranks 18th of 22 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 30.8% 48.2% 17.3% United States of America
2000s 67.8% 69.1% 1.4% United States of America
2010s 58.5% 69.5% 11.0% United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Italy or United States of America?
United States of America, at 69.5% against 58.5% in Italy as of 2010.
What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Italy and United States of America?
11.0%, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and United States of America?
10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Italy and United States of America rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
Italy ranks 21st and United States of America ranks 18th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs United States of America: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-oda-commitments-that-is-untied-percent-of-bilateral-oda-commitments/italy/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-oda-commitments-that-is-untied-percent-of-bilateral-oda-commitments/italy/united-states/">Italy vs United States of America: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments)
Unit
% of bilateral ODA commitments
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
22 places, 379 data points, 1990–2010
Last refreshed

Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.