Japan vs Luxembourg: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time
- Japan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 99.0% against 93.5% in Japan, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 6th of 22 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.4% | 89.6% | 2.8% | Japan |
| 2000s | 93.0% | 99.3% | 6.3% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 93.5% | 99.0% | 5.6% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Japan or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 99.0% against 93.5% in Japan as of 2010.
- What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Japan and Luxembourg?
- 5.5%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Luxembourg?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Japan and Luxembourg rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
- Japan ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 6th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.