Norway vs United Kingdom: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied

Norway
100.0%
in 2010
United Kingdom
100.0%
in 2010
Norway rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st

Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied over time

  • Norway
  • United Kingdom
20406080100199020002010

How they compare

Norway currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 22 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1990s 86.7% 66.2% 20.5% Norway
2000s 99.5% 98.5% 0.9% Norway
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Norway or United Kingdom?
Norway, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom as of 2010.
What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Norway and United Kingdom?
0.0%, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and United Kingdom?
19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
How do Norway and United Kingdom rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?
Norway ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs United Kingdom: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-oda-commitments-that-is-untied-percent-of-bilateral-oda-commitments/norway/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-oda-commitments-that-is-untied-percent-of-bilateral-oda-commitments/norway/united-kingdom/">Norway vs United Kingdom: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments)
Unit
% of bilateral ODA commitments
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
22 places, 379 data points, 1990–2010
Last refreshed

Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.