Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Sweden or United Kingdom?

Sweden, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom as of 2010.

How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Kingdom?

20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.

Where does this data come from?

Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sweden vs United Kingdom: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA)

Sweden

100.0%

in 2010

United Kingdom

100.0%

in 2010

Sweden rank

1st

United Kingdom rank

1st

Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA) over time

Sweden
United Kingdom

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 22 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sweden	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1990s	83.8%	62.0%	21.8%	Sweden
2000s	96.7%	98.5%	1.8%	United Kingdom
2010s	100.0%	100.0%	0.0%	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bilateral oda commitments that is untied, Sweden or United Kingdom?: Sweden, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom as of 2010.
What is the difference in bilateral oda commitments that is untied between Sweden and United Kingdom?: 0.0%, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Kingdom?: 20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Sweden and United Kingdom rank globally for bilateral oda commitments that is untied?: Sweden ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs United Kingdom: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-oda-commitments-that-is-untied-percent-of-bilateral-oda-commitments/sweden/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-oda-commitments-that-is-untied-percent-of-bilateral-oda-commitments/sweden/united-kingdom/">Sweden vs United Kingdom: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Bilateral ODA commitments that is untied (% of bilateral ODA commitments)
Unit: % of bilateral ODA commitments
Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 22 places, 379 data points, 1990–2010
Last refreshed: 30 October 2026

Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Untied bilateral official development assistance is assistance from country to country for which the associated goods and services may be fully and freely procured in substantially all countries.