Austria vs Japan: Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services

Austria
3.9%
in 2015
Japan
2.1%
in 2015
Austria rank
23rd
Japan rank
25th

Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services over time

  • Austria
  • Japan
05101520199520052015

How they compare

Austria currently reports 3.9% against 2.1% in Japan, a difference of 1.8%.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.8 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 23rd and Japan ranks 25th of 26 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 6.5% 4.0% 2.5% Austria
2000s 8.2% 6.2% 2.0% Austria
2010s 3.3% 3.1% 0.2% Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bilateral, sector-allocable oda to basic social services, Austria or Japan?
Austria, at 3.9% against 2.1% in Japan as of 2015.
What is the difference in bilateral, sector-allocable oda to basic social services between Austria and Japan?
1.8%, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Japan?
20 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2015.
How do Austria and Japan rank globally for bilateral, sector-allocable oda to basic social services?
Austria ranks 23rd and Japan ranks 25th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Japan: Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-sector-allocable-oda-to-basic-social-services-percent-of-bilateral-oda/austria/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-sector-allocable-oda-to-basic-social-services-percent-of-bilateral-oda/austria/japan/">Austria vs Japan: Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services (% of bilateral ODA commitments)
Unit
% of bilateral ODA commitments
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 459 data points, 1995–2015
Last refreshed

Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Total sector-allocable aid is the sum of aid that can be assigned to specific sectors or multisector activities. Basic social services consists of, primary education, basic life skills for youth and adults and early childhood education, basic health care, basic health infrastructure, basic nutrition, infectious disease control, health education and health personnel development, population policy and administrative management, reproductive health care, family planning, sexually transmitted disease (STD) control including HIV/AIDS, personnel development (population & reproductive health), basic drinking water supply and basic sanitation, and multi-sector aid for basic social services.