Italy vs Republic of Korea: Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services

Italy
11.4%
in 2015
Republic of Korea
13.8%
in 2015
Italy rank
11th
Republic of Korea rank
10th

Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services over time

  • Italy
  • Republic of Korea
510152025199520052015

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 13.8% against 11.4% in Italy, a difference of 2.4%.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Italy ranks 11th and Republic of Korea ranks 10th of 26 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 9.6% 12.3% 2.6% Republic of Korea
2010s 12.4% 8.8% 3.6% Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bilateral, sector-allocable oda to basic social services, Italy or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 13.8% against 11.4% in Italy as of 2015.
What is the difference in bilateral, sector-allocable oda to basic social services between Italy and Republic of Korea?
2.4%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Republic of Korea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
How do Italy and Republic of Korea rank globally for bilateral, sector-allocable oda to basic social services?
Italy ranks 11th and Republic of Korea ranks 10th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services (% of bilateral ODA commitments). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Republic of Korea: Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-sector-allocable-oda-to-basic-social-services-percent-of-bilateral-oda/italy/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/bilateral-sector-allocable-oda-to-basic-social-services-percent-of-bilateral-oda/italy/korea-rep/">Italy vs Republic of Korea: Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bilateral, sector-allocable ODA to basic social services (% of bilateral ODA commitments)
Unit
% of bilateral ODA commitments
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 459 data points, 1995–2015
Last refreshed

Bilateral official development assistance (ODA) commitments are firm obligations, expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, undertaken by official bilateral donors to provide specified assistance to a recipient country or a multilateral organization. Bilateral commitments are recorded in the full amount of expected transfer, irrespective of the time required for completing disbursements. Total sector-allocable aid is the sum of aid that can be assigned to specific sectors or multisector activities. Basic social services consists of, primary education, basic life skills for youth and adults and early childhood education, basic health care, basic health infrastructure, basic nutrition, infectious disease control, health education and health personnel development, population policy and administrative management, reproductive health care, family planning, sexually transmitted disease (STD) control including HIV/AIDS, personnel development (population & reproductive health), basic drinking water supply and basic sanitation, and multi-sector aid for basic social services.