Aruba vs San Marino: Change in maximum river flow
Aruba
-43.5%
in 2024
San Marino
-43.1%
in 2024
Aruba rank
198th
San Marino rank
196th
Change in maximum river flow over time
- Aruba
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports -43.1% against -43.5% in Aruba, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was San Marino ahead.
Aruba ranks 198th and San Marino ranks 196th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.6% | 1.6% | 6.0% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 28.0% | 1.2% | 26.8% | Aruba |
| 2020s | -35.5% | -19.4% | 16.1% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in maximum river flow, Aruba or San Marino?
- San Marino, at -43.1% against -43.5% in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between Aruba and San Marino?
- 0.4%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and San Marino?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and San Marino rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
- Aruba ranks 198th and San Marino ranks 196th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.