Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Change in maximum river flow
Australia and New Zealand
16.6%
in 2024
Rwanda
17.9%
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
55th
Rwanda rank
52nd
Change in maximum river flow over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 17.9% against 16.6% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 52nd of 196 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -18.9% | -10.1% | 8.7% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 8.1% | -1.2% | 9.3% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 18.8% | 18.0% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in maximum river flow, Australia and New Zealand or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 17.9% against 16.6% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 1.3%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 52nd of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.