Australia vs Rwanda: Change in maximum river flow
Australia
17.3%
in 2024
Rwanda
17.9%
in 2024
Australia rank
57th
Rwanda rank
56th
Change in maximum river flow over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 17.9% against 17.3% in Australia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 57th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -19.8% | -10.1% | 9.7% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 8.4% | -1.2% | 9.6% | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 18.8% | 18.1% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in maximum river flow, Australia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 17.9% against 17.3% in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between Australia and Rwanda?
- 0.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
- Australia ranks 57th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.