China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Eswatini: Change in maximum river flow

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
26.7%
in 2024
Eswatini
70.7%
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
4th
Eswatini rank
5th

Change in maximum river flow over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Eswatini
-50050200520142024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 70.7% against 26.7% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 44.0%.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.6 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 5th of 33 groups.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s -2.6% -3.5% 0.9% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2010s -0.9% -7.5% 6.5% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2020s 7.3% -10.3% 17.6% China, Macao Special Administrative Region

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in maximum river flow, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 70.7% against 26.7% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Eswatini?
44.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Eswatini?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Eswatini rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 5th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Eswatini: Change in maximum river flow. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-maximum-river-flow-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-maximum-river-flow-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/eswatini/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Eswatini: Change in maximum river flow</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in maximum river flow (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
249 places, 4,980 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed