Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Eswatini: Change in maximum river flow
Democratic Republic of the Congo
21.0%
in 2024
Eswatini
70.7%
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
3rd
Eswatini rank
5th
Change in maximum river flow over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 70.7% against 21.0% in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 49.7%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 3.4 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd and Eswatini ranks 5th of 20 regions.
Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | -3.5% | 7.6% | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 2010s | -2.8% | -7.5% | 4.7% | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 2020s | 5.0% | -10.3% | 15.3% | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in maximum river flow, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 70.7% against 21.0% in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Eswatini?
- 49.7%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Eswatini?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Eswatini rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd and Eswatini ranks 5th of 20 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.