Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in maximum river flow

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
3.3%
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
44.3%
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
23rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
20th

Change in maximum river flow over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-2002040200520142024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 44.3% against 3.3% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 41.0%.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 13.3 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 20th of 36 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s -5.4% -6.9% 1.5% Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.7% 0.0% 3.7% Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.1% 33.0% 29.9% United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in maximum river flow, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 44.3% against 3.3% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
41.0%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 20th of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in maximum river flow. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-maximum-river-flow-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-maximum-river-flow-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in maximum river flow</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in maximum river flow (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
262 places, 5,240 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed