New Caledonia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in maximum river flow
New Caledonia
43.9%
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
44.3%
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
21st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
20th
Change in maximum river flow over time
- New Caledonia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 44.3% against 43.9% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 21st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 20th of 225 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -8.5% | -6.9% | 1.5% | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 12.0% | 0.0% | 12.0% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 33.0% | 26.0% | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in maximum river flow, New Caledonia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 44.3% against 43.9% in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between New Caledonia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.4%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
- New Caledonia ranks 21st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 20th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.