Turks and Caicos Islands vs Western Sahara: Change in maximum river flow
Turks and Caicos Islands
-79.9%
in 2024
Western Sahara
-89.8%
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
195th
Western Sahara rank
196th
Change in maximum river flow over time
- Turks and Caicos Islands
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports -79.9% against -89.8% in Western Sahara, a difference of 9.9%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Western Sahara ahead.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 195th and Western Sahara ranks 196th of 196 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 2 and Western Sahara in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turks and Caicos Islands | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.4% | -47.1% | 45.7% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 31.1% | 18.9% | 12.3% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | -52.6% | -4.1% | 48.5% | Western Sahara |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in maximum river flow, Turks and Caicos Islands or Western Sahara?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at -79.9% against -89.8% in Western Sahara as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in maximum river flow between Turks and Caicos Islands and Western Sahara?
- 9.9%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Western Sahara?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Western Sahara rank globally for change in maximum river flow?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 195th and Western Sahara ranks 196th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in maximum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.