Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Change in minimum river flow
Aruba
-57.7%
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
-53.4%
in 2024
Aruba rank
181st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
178th
Change in minimum river flow over time
- Aruba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports -53.4% against -57.7% in Aruba, a difference of 4.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 181st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 178th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.8% | -43.1% | 44.8% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 26.8% | 30.5% | 3.7% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | -58.7% | -12.4% | 46.3% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in minimum river flow, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at -53.4% against -57.7% in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 4.3%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
- Aruba ranks 181st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 178th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.