Australia and New Zealand vs Lebanon: Change in minimum river flow
Australia and New Zealand
12.0%
in 2024
Lebanon
12.3%
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
63rd
Lebanon rank
62nd
Change in minimum river flow over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 12.3% against 12.0% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lebanon ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 63rd and Lebanon ranks 62nd of 196 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -13.7% | 29.4% | 43.1% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 12.4% | -11.1% | 23.5% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | -10.9% | 1.1% | 12.0% | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in minimum river flow, Australia and New Zealand or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 12.3% against 12.0% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between Australia and New Zealand and Lebanon?
- 0.3%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Lebanon?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Lebanon rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 63rd and Lebanon ranks 62nd of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.