China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Rwanda: Change in minimum river flow

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
8.4%
in 2024
Rwanda
44.4%
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
5th
Rwanda rank
14th

Change in minimum river flow over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Rwanda
-2002040200520142024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 44.4% against 8.4% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 36.0%.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 5.3 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China, Macao Special Administrative Region ahead.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 13 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s -14.2% 2.7% 17.0% Rwanda
2010s -0.2% 1.9% 2.1% Rwanda
2020s 13.6% 25.5% 11.9% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in minimum river flow, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 44.4% against 8.4% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Rwanda?
36.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Rwanda?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Rwanda rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Rwanda: Change in minimum river flow. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-minimum-river-flow-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-minimum-river-flow-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/rwanda/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Rwanda: Change in minimum river flow</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in minimum river flow (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
249 places, 4,980 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed