China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in minimum river flow

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
8.4%
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
46.5%
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Change in minimum river flow over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-200204060200520142024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 46.5% against 8.4% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 38.1%.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 5.5 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China, Macao Special Administrative Region ahead.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 37 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Macao Special Administrative Region averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s -14.2% -15.4% 1.2% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2010s -0.2% 5.0% 5.2% United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 13.6% 39.9% 26.3% United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in minimum river flow, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 46.5% against 8.4% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and United Republic of Tanzania?
38.1%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and United Republic of Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in minimum river flow. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-minimum-river-flow-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-minimum-river-flow-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/united-republic-of-tanzania/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs United Republic of Tanzania: Change in minimum river flow</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in minimum river flow (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
262 places, 5,240 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed