Guam vs New Caledonia: Change in minimum river flow
Guam
63.8%
in 2024
New Caledonia
53.2%
in 2024
Guam rank
5th
New Caledonia rank
8th
Change in minimum river flow over time
- Guam
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Guam currently reports 63.8% against 53.2% in New Caledonia, a difference of 10.6%.
That makes Guam's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 5th and New Caledonia ranks 8th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5% | -29.5% | 29.0% | Guam |
| 2010s | 3.7% | 26.9% | 23.2% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 14.1% | 0.2% | 13.9% | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in minimum river flow, Guam or New Caledonia?
- Guam, at 63.8% against 53.2% in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between Guam and New Caledonia?
- 10.6%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and New Caledonia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Guam and New Caledonia rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
- Guam ranks 5th and New Caledonia ranks 8th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.