Mali vs Oceania: Change in minimum river flow
Mali
40.3%
in 2024
Oceania
4.1%
in 2024
Mali rank
21st
Oceania rank
18th
Change in minimum river flow over time
- Mali
- Oceania
How they compare
Mali currently reports 40.3% against 4.1% in Oceania, a difference of 36.2%.
That makes Mali's figure about 9.8 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 18th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.6% | -11.9% | 9.2% | Mali |
| 2010s | -0.8% | 7.2% | 8.0% | Oceania |
| 2020s | 15.5% | 0.8% | 14.7% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in minimum river flow, Mali or Oceania?
- Mali, at 40.3% against 4.1% in Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between Mali and Oceania?
- 36.2%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Oceania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Oceania rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
- Mali ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 18th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.