New Caledonia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Change in minimum river flow
New Caledonia
53.2%
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
9.6%
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
11th
Change in minimum river flow over time
- New Caledonia
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 53.2% against 9.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 43.6%.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 5.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 11th of 226 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -29.5% | 0.1% | 29.5% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2010s | 26.9% | 0.2% | 26.8% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 2.0% | 1.8% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in minimum river flow, New Caledonia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- New Caledonia, at 53.2% against 9.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change in minimum river flow between New Caledonia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 43.6%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for change in minimum river flow?
- New Caledonia ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 11th of 226 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Change in minimum river flow (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.