Argentina vs New Zealand: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Argentina
6.6%
in 2022
New Zealand
6.9%
in 2022
Argentina rank
38th
New Zealand rank
37th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Argentina
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 6.9% against 6.6% in Argentina, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 38th and New Zealand ranks 37th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.8% | 4.5% | 2.3% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 8.4% | 4.7% | 3.7% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 8.8% | 9.1% | 0.3% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Argentina or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 6.9% against 6.6% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Argentina and New Zealand?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and New Zealand?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and New Zealand rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Argentina ranks 38th and New Zealand ranks 37th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.