Australia and New Zealand vs Brunei: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Australia and New Zealand
4.1%
in 2022
Brunei
4.0%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
58th
Brunei rank
59th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Brunei
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 4.1% against 4.0% in Brunei, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brunei ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 58th and Brunei ranks 59th of 211 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Brunei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 8.6% | 5.5% | Brunei |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 3.8% | 0.8% | Brunei |
| 2020s | 5.4% | 5.4% | 0.0% | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Australia and New Zealand or Brunei?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 4.1% against 4.0% in Brunei as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Australia and New Zealand and Brunei?
- 0.1%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Brunei?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Brunei rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 58th and Brunei ranks 59th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.