Australia and New Zealand vs France: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Australia and New Zealand
4.1%
in 2022
France
3.7%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
50th
France rank
52nd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- France
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 4.1% against 3.7% in France, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times France's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was France ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and France ranks 52nd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and France in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 2.8% | 0.2% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 3.1% | 0.1% | France |
| 2020s | 5.4% | 3.1% | 2.3% | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Australia and New Zealand or France?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 4.1% against 3.7% in France as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Australia and New Zealand and France?
- 0.4%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and France?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and France rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and France ranks 52nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.