Australia and New Zealand vs Namibia: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Australia and New Zealand
4.1%
in 2022
Namibia
4.4%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
54th
Namibia rank
53rd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 4.4% against 4.1% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 53rd of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 7.6% | 4.6% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 7.0% | 4.0% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 5.4% | 3.5% | 1.9% | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Australia and New Zealand or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 4.4% against 4.1% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
- 0.3%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Namibia rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 53rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.