Australia vs El Salvador: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Australia
3.5%
in 2022
El Salvador
3.3%
in 2022
Australia rank
57th
El Salvador rank
60th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Australia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3.5% against 3.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 57th and El Salvador ranks 60th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.4% | 3.7% | 1.3% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 6.1% | 3.8% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 4.1% | 1.8% | 2.3% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Australia or El Salvador?
- Australia, at 3.5% against 3.3% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Australia and El Salvador?
- 0.2%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Australia ranks 57th and El Salvador ranks 60th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.