Bahamas vs East Timor: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Bahamas
0.1%
in 2022
East Timor
0.2%
in 2022
Bahamas rank
171st
East Timor rank
169th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Bahamas
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Bahamas, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Timor ahead.
Bahamas ranks 171st and East Timor ranks 169th of 213 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 2.2% | 1.7% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.7% | 0.4% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Bahamas or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Bahamas as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Bahamas and East Timor?
- 0.1%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and East Timor?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Bahamas and East Timor rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Bahamas ranks 171st and East Timor ranks 169th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.