Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turkmenistan: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
0.2%
in 2022
Turkmenistan
0.2%
in 2022
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
136th
Turkmenistan rank
138th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Turkmenistan
051015200520132022

How they compare

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 136th and Turkmenistan ranks 138th of 175 countries.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 3.6% 1.8% 1.9% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 2.6% 0.6% 2.0% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 1.5% 0.6% 1.0% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Turkmenistan?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Turkmenistan as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turkmenistan?
0.0%, with Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turkmenistan?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turkmenistan rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 136th and Turkmenistan ranks 138th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turkmenistan: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/turkmenistan/">Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turkmenistan: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed