Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
0.2%
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2%
in 2022
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
139th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
136th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
051015200520132022

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 139th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 136th of 182 countries.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 3.6% 0.7% 3.0% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 2.6% 0.4% 2.2% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 1.5% 0.4% 1.1% Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 139th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 136th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed