Canada vs Congo: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Canada
15.6%
in 2022
Congo
17.8%
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Congo rank
3rd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Canada
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 17.8% against 15.6% in Canada, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Canada ranks 6th and Congo ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.8% | 24.7% | 17.0% | Congo |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 16.0% | 5.2% | Congo |
| 2020s | 13.3% | 14.6% | 1.2% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Canada or Congo?
- Congo, at 17.8% against 15.6% in Canada as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Canada and Congo?
- 2.2%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Congo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Canada and Congo rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Canada ranks 6th and Congo ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.