Canada vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Canada
15.6%
in 2022
Democratic Republic of the Congo
14.4%
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
1st

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Canada
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
51015202530200520132022

How they compare

Canada currently reports 15.6% against 14.4% in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 1.2%.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Canada ranks 6th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 7.8% 23.6% 15.8% Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 10.8% 15.3% 4.5% Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 13.3% 12.2% 1.1% Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Canada or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Canada, at 15.6% against 14.4% in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Canada and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
1.2%, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Canada and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Canada ranks 6th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/canada/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/canada/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Canada vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed