Canada vs Northern Europe: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Canada
15.6%
in 2022
Northern Europe
6.1%
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Northern Europe rank
3rd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Canada
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Canada currently reports 15.6% against 6.1% in Northern Europe, a difference of 9.5%.
That makes Canada's figure about 2.6 times Northern Europe's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 6th and Northern Europe ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.8% | 3.8% | 3.9% | Canada |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 4.5% | 6.3% | Canada |
| 2020s | 13.3% | 5.3% | 8.0% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Canada or Northern Europe?
- Canada, at 15.6% against 6.1% in Northern Europe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Canada and Northern Europe?
- 9.5%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Northern Europe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Canada and Northern Europe rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Canada ranks 6th and Northern Europe ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.